Daily home fortification with iron as ferrous fumarate versus NaFeEDTA: a randomised, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial in Kenyan children
View/ Open
Publication Date
2017Author
Emily M Teshome, Pauline EA Andang’o, Victor Osoti, Sofie R Terwel, Walter Otieno, Ayşe Y Demir, Andrew M Prentice, Hans Verhoef
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract/ Overview
Background: We aimed to show the non-inferiority of home fortification with a daily dose of 3 mg iron in the
form of iron as ferric sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (NaFeEDTA) compared with 12.5 mg iron as encapsulated
ferrous fumarate in Kenyan children aged 12–36 months. In addition, we updated a recent meta-analysis to assess
the efficacy of home fortification with iron-containing powders, with a view to examining diversity in trial results.
Methods: We gave chemoprevention by dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, albendazole and praziquantel to 338
afebrile children with haemoglobin concentration ≥70 g/L. We randomly allocated them to daily home fortification
for 30 days with either placebo, 3 mg iron as NaFeEDTA or 12.5 mg iron as encapsulated ferrous fumarate. We
assessed haemoglobin concentration (primary outcome), plasma iron markers, plasma inflammation markers and
Plasmodium infection in samples collected at baseline and after 30 days of intervention. We conducted a meta-analysis
of randomised controlled trials in pre-school children to assess the effect of home fortification with iron-containing
powders on anaemia and haemoglobin concentration at end of intervention.
Results: A total of 315 children completed the 30-day intervention period. At baseline, 66.9% of children had inflammation
(plasma C-reactive protein concentration >5 mg/L or plasma α1-acid glycoprotein concentration >1.0 g/L);
in those without inflammation, 42.5% were iron deficient. There was no evidence, either in per protocol analysis or
intention-to-treat analysis, that home fortification with either of the iron interventions improved haemoglobin
concentration, plasma ferritin concentration, plasma transferrin receptor concentration or erythrocyte zinc
protoporphyrin-haem ratio. We also found no evidence of effect modification by iron status, anaemia status and
inflammation status at baseline. In the meta-analysis, the effect on haemoglobin concentration was highly
heterogeneous between trials (I
2
: 84.1%; p value for test of heterogeneity: <0.0001).
Conclusions: In this population, home fortification with either 3 mg iron as NaFeEDTA or 12.5 mg iron as encapsulated
ferrous fumarate was insufficiently efficacious to assess non-inferiority of 3 mg iron as NaFeEDTA compared to 12.5 mg
iron as encapsulated ferrous fumarate. Our finding of heterogeneity between trial results should stimulate subgroup
analysis or meta-regression to identify population-specific factors that determine efficacy.
Trial Registration: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02073149) on 25 February 2014.